| TABLES |
|
| Table 1.1 |
Number of Districts and Student Enrollments (Districts With Enrollments of at Least 1,000 Students) |
| Table 1.2 |
Types of Schools in the United States |
| Table 1.3 |
Number of Students in the United States |
| Table 1.4 |
Public and Charter Schools by Grade Level |
| Table 1.5 |
Public and Charter Schools by Region |
| Table 1.6 |
Public and Charter Schools by Metropolitan Status |
| Table 1.7 |
Public and Charter Schools by Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program |
| Table 1.8 |
A Taxonomy of the K-12 Education Market |
| Table 1.9 |
Estimates of K-12 Expenditures for 2010-2011 |
| Table 1.10 |
Percentage of Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education by Function, 2007-2008 |
| Table 1.11 |
New York State Common Core State Standards Timeline |
| Table 2.1 |
Summary of District Spending on All Instructional Materials (AIM): 1990-1991 Through 2009-2010 |
| Table 2.2 |
Instructional Budget Allocation by District Size, Metropolitan Status, and Region |
| Table 2.3 |
Impact of Budget Cutbacks (Curriculum Directors) by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 2.4 |
Instructional Budget Outlook by District Size, Metropolitan Status, and Region |
| Table 2.5 |
Important Factors Influencing Purchasing Decisions of Basal and Supplemental Materials: All Districts |
| Table 2.6 |
Important Factors Influencing Purchasing Decisions of Basal and Supplemental Materials by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 2.7 |
Curriculum Initiative Priorities: All Districts |
| Table 2.8 |
Curriculum Initiative Priorities by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 2.9 |
Most Frequently Mentioned Favorite Math Materials |
| Table 2.10 |
Most Frequently Mentioned Favorite Reading/Language Arts Materials |
| Table 2.11 |
Textbook Adoption States |
| Table 2.12 |
Restricting Access to Online Resources: All Districts |
| Table 2.13 |
Percentage of Content in Digital Format by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 2.14 |
Print-to-Digital Conversion (Technology Directors’ Responses) by District Size |
| Table 2.15 |
Print-to-Digital Conversion (Technology Directors’ Responses) by Metropolitan Status |
| Table 2.16 |
Print-to-Digital Conversion: Comparison of Curriculum Directors’ and Technology Directors’ Responses |
| Table 2.17 |
Print-to-Digital Conversion (Curriculum Directors’ Responses) by Metropolitan Status |
| Table 2.18 |
Print-to-Digital Conversion (Curriculum Directors’ Responses) by District Size |
| Table 2.19 |
Devices Districts Would Consider Using to Deliver Digital Instructional Materials: All Districts |
| Table 2.20 |
Devices Districts Would Consider Using to Deliver Digital Instructional Materials by District Size |
| Table 2.21 |
Devices Districts Would Consider Using to Deliver Digital Instructional Materials by Metropolitan Status |
| Table 2.22 |
Barriers to Use of Digital Content Encountered by Teachers: Comparison of Curriculum Directors’ and Technology Directors’ Responses |
| Table 2.23 |
Barriers to Use of Digital Content Encountered by Teachers (Curriculum Directors’ Responses): All Districts |
| Table 2.24 |
Barriers to Use of Digital Content Encountered by Teachers (Technology Directors’ Responses): All Districts |
| Table 2.25 |
Barriers to Use of Digital Content Encountered Often by Teachers (Curriculum Directors’ Responses) by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 2.26 |
Barriers to Use of Digital Content Encountered by Teachers (Technology Directors’ Responses) by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 2.27 |
Receptiveness Toward Use of Open Educational Resources (OER) by District Size |
| Table 2.28 |
Receptiveness Toward Use of Open Educational Resources (OER) by Metropolitan Status |
| Table 2.29 |
Penetration Rates of Assessment Providers by Grade Level |
| Table 2.30 |
Penetration Rates of Assessment Providers by Grade Level and District Size |
| Table 2.31 |
Penetration Rates of Assessment Providers by Grade Level and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 2.32 |
Penetration Rates of Assessment Providers by Grade Level and Region |
| Table 2.33 |
Distribution of Assessment Providers by Grade Level |
| Table 2.34 |
Implementation of Response to Intervention (RtI) by Grade Level: All Districts |
| Table 2.35 |
Implementation of Response to Intervention (RtI) by Grade Level and District Size |
| Table 2.36 |
Implementation of Response to Intervention (RtI) by Grade Level and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 2.37 |
Percentage of Students Served by Response to Intervention (RtI): All Districts |
| Table 2.38 |
Percentage of Students Served by Response to Intervention (RtI): Small Districts |
| Table 2.39 |
Percentage of Students Served by Response to Intervention (RtI): Medium Districts |
| Table 2.40 |
Percentage of Students Served by Response to Intervention (RtI): Large Districts |
| Table 3.1 |
Enhancing Education Through Technology (EETT) Appropriation Levels |
| Table 3.2 |
Per-Pupil Expenditures on Technology by District Size |
| Table 3.3 |
Impact of Budget Cutbacks (Technology Directors) by District Size, Metropolitan Status, and Region |
| Table 3.4 |
Technology Budget Outlook: All Districts |
| Table 3.5 |
Technology Budget Outlook by District Size, Metropolitan Status, and Region |
| Table 3.6 |
Technology Initiative Priorities: All Districts |
| Table 3.7 |
Technology Initiative Priorities by District Size |
| Table 3.8 |
Technology Initiative Priorities by Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.9 |
Implementation of Instructional Technologies: All Districts |
| Table 3.10 |
Implementation of Instructional Technologies by District Size |
| Table 3.11 |
Implementation of Instructional Technologies by Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.12 |
Personal Portable Computing Access by Grade Level |
| Table 3.13 |
Personal Portable Computing Access by Grade Level by District Size |
| Table 3.14 |
Personal Portable Computing Access by Grade Level by Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.15 |
Preferred Portable Devices to Gather/Report Information: All Districts |
| Table 3.16 |
Preferred Portable Devices to Gather/Report Information by District Size |
| Table 3.17 |
Preferred Portable Devices to Gather/Report Information by Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.18 |
Penetration Rates of Interactive Whiteboard Providers by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.19 |
Penetration Rates of Interactive Whiteboard Providers by Region |
| Table 3.20 |
Penetration Rates of Classroom Response System Providers by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.21 |
Penetration Rates of Classroom Response System Providers by Region |
| Table 3.22 |
Comparison of Penetration Rates of Interactive Whiteboard and Classroom Response System Providers |
| Table 3.23 |
Classroom Response Systems Used by Districts With SMART and Promethean Interactive Whiteboards (IWB) |
| Table 3.24 |
Districts With Schoolwide Wireless Networks by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.25 |
Districts With Schoolwide Wireless Networks by Region |
| Table 3.26 |
Mean Bandwidth (Mbps) From the Internet to Districts by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.27 |
Mean Bandwidth (Mbps) From the Internet to Districts by District Size and Region |
| Table 3.28 |
Mean Bandwidth (Kbps) Per Student From the Internet to Districts by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.29 |
Mean Bandwidth (Mbps) From the Internet to Districts by District Size and Region |
| Table 3.30 |
Implementation of Enterprise Software Systems: All Districts |
| Table 3.31 |
Implementation of Enterprise Software Systems by District Size |
| Table 3.32 |
Implementation of Enterprise Software Systems by Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.33 |
Interoperability Strategies by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.34 |
Increased Use of Remote Hosting of Applications as a Response to Budget Cutbacks (Technology Directors) by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.35 |
Software as a Service (SaaS): Usage Rates by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.36 |
Software as a Service (SaaS) Applications: All Districts |
| Table 3.37 |
Software as a Service (SaaS) Applications by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.38 |
Software as a Service (SaaS): Reasons for Not Using by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.39 |
Usage of Open Source Applications by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.40 |
Increased Use of Open Source Applications as a Response to Budget Cutbacks (Technology Directors) by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.41 |
Types of Open Source Applications Used or Planned: All Districts |
| Table 3.42 |
Types of Open Source Applications Used or Planned by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.43 |
Software as a Service (SaaS) Applications by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.44 |
Types of Open Source Applications Used or Planned: All Districts |
| Table 3.45 |
Implementation of Student Information Systems: All Districts |
| Table 3.46 |
Implementation of Student Information Systems by District Size |
| Table 3.47 |
Implementation of Student Information Systems by Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.48 |
Penetration Rates of Student Information Systems (SIS) by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.49 |
Penetration Rates of Student Information Systems (SIS) by Region |
| Table 3.50 |
Software as a Service (SaaS) Applications by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.51 |
Types of Open Source Applications Used or Planned by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.52 |
Penetration Rates of Data Warehouse (DW) and Analytics: All Districts |
| Table 3.53 |
Penetration Rates of Data Warehouse (DW) and Analytics by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.54 |
Penetration Rates of Data Warehouse (DW) and Analytics by Region |
| Table 3.55 |
Districts Using the Same Provider for Data Warehouse (DW) and Analytics |
| Table 3.56 |
Important Learning Management System Features: Comparison of Curriculum and Technology Directors’ Views |
| Table 3.57 |
Importance of Learning Management System Features for Curriculum Directors: All Districts |
| Table 3.58 |
Importance of Learning Management System Features for Technology Directors: All Districts |
| Table 3.59 |
Important Learning Management System Features Cited by Curriculum Directors by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.60 |
Important Learning Management System Features Cited by Technology Directors by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.61 |
Implementation of Learning Management Systems (LMS): All Districts |
| Table 3.62 |
Implementation of Learning Management Systems (LMS) by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.63 |
Usage of Learning Management Systems (LMS) by Grade Level, District Size, Metropolitan Status, and Region |
| Table 3.64 |
Penetration Rates of Learning Management Systems (LMS) by Grade Level |
| Table 3.65 |
Distribution of Learning Management Systems (LMS) by Grade Level |
| Table 3.66 |
Penetration Rates of Learning Management Systems (LMS) by Grade Level by District Size |
| Table 3.67 |
Penetration Rates of Learning Management Systems (LMS) by Grade Level by Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.68 |
Prohibiting Access to Online Resources by Grade Level: All Districts |
| Table 3.69 |
Prohibiting Access to Online Resources by Grade Level and District Size |
| Table 3.70 |
Prohibiting Access to Online Resources by Grade Level and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.71 |
Restricting Access to Online Resources: All Districts |
| Table 3.72 |
Restricting Access to Online Resources by District Size |
| Table 3.73 |
Restricting Access to Online Resources by Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.74 |
Increased Use of Online Courses as a Response to Budget Cutbacks (Curriculum Directors) by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.75 |
Increased Use of Online Courses as a Response to Budget Cutbacks (Technology Directors) by Region |
| Table 3.76 |
Online Learning and Blended Learning Providers |
| Table 3.77 |
Plans for Offering Online Courses by Grade Level: All Districts |
| Table 3.78 |
Plans for Offering Online Courses by Grade Level by District Size |
| Table 3.79 |
Plans for Offering Online Courses by Grade Level by Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.80 |
Online Course Categories: All Districts |
| Table 3.81 |
Online Course Categories by District Size, Metropolitan Status, and Region |
| Table 3.82 |
Online Course Categories by Percentage of Students Eligible for the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program |
| Table 3.83 |
Online Course Offerings by Subject Area in Middle and High Schools by District Size |
| Table 3.84 |
Online Course Offerings by Subject Area in Middle and High Schools by Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.85 |
Online Course Offerings by Subject Area in Middle and High Schools by Region |
| Table 3.86 |
Curriculum Initiative Priorities by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.87 |
Penetration Rates of Online Content Providers by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 3.88 |
Penetration Rates of Online Content Providers by Region |
|
|
| Table 4.1 |
Professional Development Goals: All Districts |
| Table 4.2 |
Professional Development Goals Cited as Important by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 4.3 |
Frequency of Use of Types of Professional Development: All Districts |
| Table 4.4 |
Frequency of Use of Types of Professional Development by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 4.5 |
Effectiveness of Types of Professional Development: All Districts |
| Table 4.6 |
Most Effective Types of Professional Development by District Size, Metropolitan Status, and Region |
| Table 4.7 |
Professional Development Budget by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 4.8 |
Professional Development Budget by District Size and Region |
| Table 4.9 |
Outside Providers of Professional Development by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 4.10 |
Outside Providers of Professional Development by District Size and Region |
| Table 4.11 |
Penetration Rates of Test-Prep Providers by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table 4.12 |
Penetration Rates of Test-Prep Providers by Region |
| Table 4.13 |
Locations (14 States Plus D.C.) With 100 or More Charter Schools |
| Table A.1 |
Number of Districts and Student Enrollments in the U.S. and in Surveys by District Size |
| Table A.2 |
Number of Districts and Student Enrollments in the U.S. and in Surveys by Region |
| Table A.3 |
Number of Districts and Student Enrollments in the U.S. and in Surveys by Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.4 |
The Education Market |
| Table A.5 |
School Types by Grade Level |
| Table A.6 |
School Types by Region |
| Table A.7 |
School Types by Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.8 |
Student Enrollments in School Types by Region |
| Table A.9 |
Average Student Enrollments in School Types by Region |
| Table A.10 |
Student Enrollments in School Types by Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.11 |
Average Student Enrollments in School Types by Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.12 |
Student Enrollments by Grade Level |
| Table A.13 |
Student Enrollments by Region |
| Table A.14 |
Student Enrollments by Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.15 |
Student Enrollments by Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program |
| Table A.16 |
Districts and Students by State |
| Table A.17 |
Number of Districts and Student Enrollments by District Size |
| Table A.18 |
School Districts by District Size and Region |
| Table A.19 |
School Districts by Region and Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.20 |
School Districts by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.21 |
School Districts by Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program and District Size |
| Table A.22 |
School Districts by Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program and Region |
| Table A.23 |
School Districts by Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program and Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.24 |
Districts by Special Ed Enrollment and District Size |
| Table A.25 |
Districts by Special Ed Enrollment and Region |
| Table A.26 |
Districts by Special Ed Enrollment and Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.27 |
Districts by Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Enrollment and District Size |
| Table A.28 |
Districts by Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Enrollment and Region |
| Table A.29 |
Districts by Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Enrollment and Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.30 |
Per-Pupil Expenditures on Instructional Materials by District Size |
| Table A.31 |
Per-Pupil Expenditures on Instructional Materials by Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.32 |
Per-Pupil Expenditures on Instructional Materials by Region |
| Table A.33 |
Per-Pupil Expenditures on Instructional Materials by Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program |
| Table A.34 |
Impact of Budget Cutbacks (Curriculum Directors) by Region |
| Table A.35 |
Instructional Budget Allocation by Metropolitan Status and Region: 2011 and 2010 |
| Table A.36 |
Factors Influencing Purchasing Decisions of Basal and Supplemental Materials by District Size |
| Table A.37 |
Factors Influencing Purchasing Decisions of Basal and Supplemental Materials by Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.38 |
Curriculum Initiative Priorities by District Size |
| Table A.39 |
Curriculum Initiative Priorities by Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.40 |
Barriers to Use of Digital Content Encountered by Teachers (Curriculum Directors’ Responses) by District Size |
| Table A.41 |
Barriers to Use of Digital Content Encountered by Teachers (Curriculum Directors’ Responses) by Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.42 |
Barriers to Use of Digital Content Encountered Often by Teachers (Curriculum Directors’ Responses) by Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program |
| Table A.43 |
Barriers to Use of Digital Content Encountered by Teachers (Technology Directors’ Responses) by District Size |
| Table A.44 |
Barriers to Use of Digital Content Encountered by Teachers (Technology Directors’ Responses) by Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.45 |
Percentage of Districts Citing Barriers to Use of Digital Content (Technology Directors’ Responses) by Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program |
| Table A.46 |
Percentage of Students Served by Response to Intervention (Rtl): Rural Districts |
| Table A.47 |
Percentage of Students Served by Response to Intervention (Rtl): Suburban Districts |
| Table A.48 |
Percentage of Students Served by Response to Intervention (Rtl): Urban Districts |
| Table A.49 |
Per-Pupil Expenditures on Technology by Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.50 |
Per-Pupil Expenditures on Technology by Region |
| Table A.51 |
Plans for Offering Online Courses by Grade Level and Region |
| Table A.52 |
Importance of Learning Management System Features for Curriculum Directors by District Size |
| Table A.53 |
Importance of Learning Management System Features for Curriculum Directors by Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.54 |
Technology Budget Outlook: Small Districts |
| Table A.55 |
Technology Budget Outlook: Medium Districts |
| Table A.56 |
Technology Budget Outlook: Large Districts |
| Table A.57 |
Technology Budget Outlook: Rural Districts |
| Table A.58 |
Technology Budget Outlook: Suburban Districts |
| Table A.59 |
Technology Budget Outlook: Urban Districts |
| Table A.60 |
Technology Budget Outlook: Northeastern Districts |
| Table A.61 |
Technology Budget Outlook: Midwestern Districts |
| Table A.62 |
Technology Budget Outlook: Western Districts |
| Table A.63 |
Technology Budget Outlook: Southern Districts |
| Table A.64 |
Technology Budget Outlook by the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program |
| Table A.65 |
Importance of Learning Management System (LMS) Features for Technology Directors by District Size |
| Table A.66 |
Importance of Learning Management System (LMS) Features for Technology Directors by Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.67 |
Penetration Rates of Learning Management System (LMS) by Grade Level by Region |
| Table A.68 |
Software as a Service (SaaS): Usage Rates by Region |
| Table A.69 |
Software as a Service (SaaS): Reasons for Not Using by Region |
| Table A.70 |
Personal Portable Computing Access by Grade Level by Region |
| Table A.71 |
Personal Portable Computing Access in Elementary Schools by the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program |
| Table A.72 |
Personal Portable Computing Access in Middle Schools by the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program |
| Table A.73 |
Personal Portable Computing Access in High Schools by the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program |
|
|
| Table A.74 |
Professional Development Goals by District Size |
| Table A.75 |
Professional Development Goals by Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.76 |
Professional Development Goals Cited as Important by Participation in Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program |
| Table A.77 |
Frequency of Use of Types of Professional Development by District Size |
| Table A.78 |
Frequency of Use of Types of Professional Development by Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.79 |
Frequency of Use of Types of Professional Development by Region |
| Table A.80 |
Effectiveness of Types of Professional Development by District Size |
| Table A.81 |
Effectiveness of Types of Professional Development by Metropolitan Status |
| Table A.82 |
Effectiveness of Types of Professional Development by Region |
| FIGURES |
|
| Figure 1.1 |
Number of Districts and Student Enrollments by District Size |
| Figure 1.2 |
Enrollments in U.S. Districts and Districts in Surveys by District Size |
| Figure 1.3 |
Number of Districts in the U.S. and in Surveys by District Size |
| Figure 1.4 |
Enrollments in U.S. Districts and Districts in Surveys by Region |
| Figure 1.5 |
Number of Districts in the U.S. and in Surveys by Region |
| Figure 1.6 |
Enrollments in U.S. Districts and Districts in Surveys by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 1.7 |
Number of Districts in the U.S. and in Surveys by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 1.8 |
School Types by Grade Level |
| Figure 1.9 |
Public and Charter Schools by Grade Level |
| Figure 1.10 |
Geographic Regions of the U.S. |
| Figure 1.11 |
Public and Charter Schools by Region |
| Figure 1.12 |
Public and Charter Schools by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 1.13 |
Public and Charter Schools by Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program |
| Figure 1.14 |
School Districts by District Size and Region |
| Figure 1.15 |
School Districts by Region and Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 1.16 |
School Districts by District Size and Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 1.17 |
School Districts by Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program and District Size |
| Figure 1.18 |
School Districts by Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program and Region |
| Figure 1.19 |
School Districts by Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program and Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 1.20 |
Districts by Special Ed Enrollment and District Size |
| Figure 1.21 |
Districts by Special Ed Enrollment and Region |
| Figure 1.22 |
Districts by Special Ed Enrollment and Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 1.23 |
Districts by LEP Enrollment and District Size |
| Figure 1.24 |
Districts by LEP Enrollment and Region |
| Figure 1.25 |
Districts by LEP Enrollment and Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 1.26 |
Sources of Funding for Public K-12 Schools, 2010-2011 |
| Figure 1.27 |
Percentage Distribution of Current Expenditures for K-12 Public Education by Function, 2007-2008 |
| Figure 2.1 |
Summary of District Spending on All Instructional Materials (AIM): 1990-1991 Through 2009-2010 |
| Figure 2.2 |
Per-Pupil Expenditures on Instructional Materials by District Size |
| Figure 2.3 |
Per-Pupil Expenditures on Instructional Materials by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 2.4 |
Per-Pupil Expenditures on Instructional Materials by Region |
| Figure 2.5 |
Per-Pupil Expenditures on Instructional Materials by Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program |
| Figure 2.6 |
Instructional Budget Allocation by District Size |
| Figure 2.7 |
Instructional Budget Allocation by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 2.8 |
Instructional Budget Allocation by Region |
| Figure 2.9 |
Impact of Budget Cutbacks (Curriculum Directors): All Districts |
| Figure 2.10 |
Instructional Budget Outlook by District Size |
| Figure 2.11 |
Instructional Budget Outlook by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 2.12 |
Instructional Budget Outlook by Region |
| Figure 2.13 |
Important Factors Influencing Purchasing Decisions of Basal and Supplemental Materials: All Districts |
| Figure 2.14 |
Curriculum Initiative Priorities: All Districts |
| Figure 2.15 |
Curriculum Initiative Priorities by Metropolitan Status (Percentage Citing Initiative as High Priority) |
| Figure 2.16 |
Curriculum Initiative Priorities by District Size (Percentage Citing Initiative as High Priority) |
| Figure 2.17 |
Implementation of Streaming Digital Media by District Size |
| Figure 2.18 |
Implementation of Streaming Digital Media by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 2.19 |
Restricting Access to Online Resources: All Districts |
| Figure 2.20 |
Restricting Access to Online Resources by District Size |
| Figure 2.21 |
Restricting Access to Online Resources by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 2.22 |
Implementation of Gaming and Simulation Technologies (Percentage Citing Initiative as High Priority) |
| Figure 2.23 |
Districts Citing Availability of Instructional Materials in Digital Format as an Important Factor in Purchasing Decisions |
| Figure 2.24 |
Percentage of Content in Digital Format by District Size |
| Figure 2.25 |
Percentage of Content in Digital Format by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 2.26 |
Increasing Use of Digital Materials as a Response to Budget Cutbacks (Curriculum and Technology Directors) |
| Figure 2.27 |
Print-to-Digital Conversion by District Size |
| Figure 2.28 |
Print-to-Digital Conversion by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 2.29 |
Percentage of Curriculum and Technology Directors Expecting Substantial Print-to-Digital Conversion Over the Next Three Years by District Size |
| Figure 2.30 |
Percentage of Curriculum and Technology Directors Expecting Substantial Print-to-Digital Conversion Over the Next Three Years by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 2.31 |
Print-to-Digital Conversion (Curriculum Directors’ Responses): 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 2.32 |
Print-to-Digital Conversion (Curriculum Directors’ Responses) by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 2.33 |
Print-to-Digital Conversion (Curriculum Directors’ Responses) by District Size |
| Figure 2.34 |
Replacement of Textbooks With Online Resources (Percentage Citing Initiative as High Priority) |
| Figure 2.35 |
Devices Districts Would Consider Using to Deliver Digital Instructional Materials by District Size |
| Figure 2.36 |
Devices Districts Would Consider Using to Deliver Digital Instructional Materials by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 2.37 |
Barriers to Use of Digital Content Encountered by Teachers: Curriculum Directors’ and Technology Directors’ Responses |
| Figure 2.38 |
Increased Use of Free Instructional Materials as Response to Budget Cuts |
| Figure 2.39 |
Increasing Use of Open Source Content as a Response to Budget Cutbacks |
| Figure 2.40 |
Receptiveness Toward Use of Open Educational Resources (OER) by District Size |
| Figure 2.41 |
Receptiveness Toward Use of Open Educational Resources (OER) by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 2.42 |
Penetration Rates of Assessment Providers in Elementary Schools: 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 2.43 |
Penetration Rates of Assessment Providers in Middle Schools: 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 2.44 |
Penetration Rates of Assessment Providers in High Schools: 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 2.45 |
Funding Sources for Response to Intervention (RtI) Implementation in Districts |
| Figure 2.46 |
Districts Citing Support for RtI as an Important Factor in Purchasing Decisions |
| Figure 2.47 |
Implementation of Response to Intervention (Rtl) by Grade Level: 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 2.48 |
Implementation of Response to Intervention (Rtl) by Grade Level and District Size |
| Figure 2.49 |
Implementation of Response to Intervention (Rtl) by Grade Level and Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 2.50 |
Percentage of Students Served by Response to Intervention (RtI): All Districts |
| Figure 3.1 |
Per-Pupil Expenditures on Technology by District Size |
| Figure 3.2 |
Per-Pupil Expenditures on Technology by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.3 |
Per-Pupil Expenditures on Technology by Region |
| Figure 3.4 |
Impact of Budget Cutbacks (Technology Directors): All Districts |
| Figure 3.5 |
Technology Budget Outlook: All Districts |
| Figure 3.6 |
Technology Budget Outlook by District Size (Percentage Projecting Decreases) |
| Figure 3.7 |
Technology Budget Outlook by Metropolitan Status (Percentage Projecting Decreases) |
| Figure 3.8 |
Technology Budget Outlook by Region (Percentage Projecting Decreases) |
| Figure 3.9 |
High-Priority Technology Initiatives: 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 3.10 |
Technology Initiative Priorities: All Districts |
| Figure 3.11 |
Implementation of Instructional Technologies: All Districts |
| Figure 3.12 |
Substantial Implementation of Instructional Technologies: 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 3.13 |
Implementation of One-to-One Computing by District Size |
| Figure 3.14 |
Implementation of One-to-One Computing by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.15 |
District Priorities on One-to-One Computing by District Size |
| Figure 3.16 |
District Priorities on One-to-One Computing by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.17 |
Students With Full-Time Access to Personal Portable Computing by Grade Level: All Districts |
| Figure 3.18 |
District Priorities on Student-Owned Devices by District Size |
| Figure 3.19 |
District Priorities on Student-Owned Devices by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.20 |
Preferred Portable Devices to Gather/Report Information: All Districts |
| Figure 3.21 |
District Priorities on Desktop Virtualization by District Size |
| Figure 3.22 |
District Priorities on Desktop Virtualization by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.23 |
District Priorities on Public Cloud Applications by District Size |
| Figure 3.24 |
District Priorities on Public Cloud Applications by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.25 |
District Priorities on Private Cloud Applications by District Size |
| Figure 3.26 |
District Priorities on Private Cloud Applications by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.27 |
Implementation of Smartphones by District Size |
| Figure 3.28 |
Implementation of Smartphones by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.29 |
District Priorities on Smartphones by District Size |
| Figure 3.30 |
District Priorities on Smartphones by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.31 |
Implementation of iPods by District Size |
| Figure 3.32 |
Implementation of iPods by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.33 |
District Priorities on iPods by District Size |
| Figure 3.34 |
District Priorities on iPods by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.35 |
Implementation of eBook Readers by District Size |
| Figure 3.36 |
Implementation of eBook Readers by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.37 |
Implementation of Tablets by District Size |
| Figure 3.38 |
Implementation of Tablets by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.39 |
District Priorities on Tablets by District Size |
| Figure 3.40 |
District Priorities on Tablets by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.41 |
Implementation of Netbooks by District Size |
| Figure 3.42 |
Implementation of Netbooks by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.43 |
District Priorities on Netbooks by District Size |
| Figure 3.44 |
District Priorities on Netbooks by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.45 |
Implementation of Thin Clients by District Size |
| Figure 3.46 |
Implementation of Thin Clients by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.47 |
District Priorities on Thin Clients by District Size |
| Figure 3.48 |
District Priorities on Thin Clients by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.49 |
Implementation of Interactive Whiteboards by District Size |
| Figure 3.50 |
Implementation of Interactive Whiteboards by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.51 |
District Priorities on Interactive Whiteboards by District Size |
| Figure 3.52 |
District Priorities on Interactive Whiteboards by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.53 |
Penetration Rates of Interactive Whiteboard Providers: 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 3.54 |
Penetration Rates of Interactive Whiteboard Providers by District Size |
| Figure 3.55 |
Penetration Rates of Interactive Whiteboard Providers by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.56 |
Penetration Rates of Interactive Whiteboard Providers by Region |
| Figure 3.57 |
Implementation of Classroom Response Systems by District Size |
| Figure 3.58 |
Implementation of Classroom Response Systems by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.59 |
Penetration Rates of Classroom Response System Providers: 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 3.60 |
Penetration Rates of Classroom Response System Providers by District Size |
| Figure 3.61 |
Penetration Rates of Classroom Response System Providers by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.62 |
Penetration Rates of Classroom Response System Providers by Region |
| Figure 3.63 |
Comparison of Penetration Rates of Interactive Whiteboard and Classroom Response System Providers |
| Figure 3.64 |
Districts With Schoolwide Wireless Networks: 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 3.65 |
Districts With Schoolwide Wireless Networks by District Size |
| Figure 3.66 |
Districts With Schoolwide Wireless Networks by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.67 |
Districts With Schoolwide Wireless Networks by Region |
| Figure 3.68 |
District Priorities on Wireless Networks by District Size |
| Figure 3.69 |
District Priorities on Wireless Networks by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.70 |
Mean Bandwidth (Kbps) Per Student From the Internet to Districts by District Size |
| Figure 3.71 |
Mean Bandwidth (Kbps) Per Student From the Internet to Districts by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.72 |
Mean Bandwidth (Kbps) Per Student From the Internet to Districts by Region |
| Figure 3.73 |
District Priorities on IT Outsourcing by District Size |
| Figure 3.74 |
District Priorities on IT Outsourcing by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.75 |
Substantial Implementations of Enterprise Software Systems: 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 3.76 |
Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning by District Size |
| Figure 3.77 |
Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.78 |
Implementation of Data Warehouse/Analytics by District Size |
| Figure 3.79 |
Implementation of Data Warehouse/Analytics by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.80 |
Interoperability Strategies by District Size |
| Figure 3.81 |
Interoperability Strategies by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.82 |
District Priorities on Public Cloud Applications by District Size |
| Figure 3.83 |
District Priorities on Private Cloud Applications by District Size |
| Figure 3.84 |
District Priorities on Public Cloud Applications by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.85 |
District Priorities on Private Cloud Applications by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.86 |
Software as a Service (SaaS): Usage Rates by District Size |
| Figure 3.87 |
Software as a Service (SaaS): Usage Rates by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.88 |
Software as a Service (SaaS) Applications: All Districts |
| Figure 3.89 |
Current Usage of Software as a Service (SaaS) Applications by District Size |
| Figure 3.90 |
Current Usage of Software as a Service (SaaS) Applications by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.91 |
Software as a Service (SaaS): Reasons for Not Using by District Size |
| Figure 3.92 |
Software as a Service (SaaS): Reasons for Not Using by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.93 |
Usage of Open Source Software by District Size |
| Figure 3.94 |
Usage of Open Source Software by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.95 |
Types of Open Source Applications Used or Planned: All Districts |
| Figure 3.96 |
Types of Open Source Applications Used: 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 3.97 |
Types of Open Source Software Used by District Size |
| Figure 3.98 |
Types of Open Source Software Used by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.99 |
Providers of Library Resources Management Systems, 2010 |
| Figure 3.100 |
Penetration Rates of Student Information Systems: 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 3.101 |
Penetration Rates of Student Information Systems by District Size |
| Figure 3.102 |
Penetration Rates of Student Information Systems by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.103 |
Penetration Rates of Student Information Systems by Region |
| Figure 3.104 |
Preferred Portable Devices to Gather/Report Three Types of Information: All Districts |
| Figure 3.105 |
Implementation of Data Warehouse/Analytics by District Size |
| Figure 3.106 |
Implementation of Data Warehouse/Analytics by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.107 |
Penetration Rates of Data Warehouse: 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 3.108 |
Penetration Rates of Data Warehouse and Analytics: All Districts |
| Figure 3.109 |
Penetration Rates of Data Warehouse by District Size |
| Figure 3.110 |
Penetration Rates of Data Warehouse by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.111 |
Penetration Rates of Data Warehouse by Region |
| Figure 3.112 |
Important Learning Management System Features: Comparison of Curriculum and Technology Directors’ Views |
| Figure 3.113 |
Usage of Learning Management Systems (LMS) by Grade Level |
| Figure 3.114 |
Implementation of Learning Management Systems (LMS) by District Size |
| Figure 3.115 |
Implementation of Learning Management Systems (LMS) by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.116 |
Penetration Rates of Learning Management Systems (LMS): 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 3.117 |
Penetration Rates of Learning Management Systems (LMS) by Grade Level |
| Figure 3.118 |
Implementation of Wikis/Blogs by District Size |
| Figure 3.119 |
Implementation of Wikis/Blogs by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.120 |
Prohibiting Access to Online Resources by Grade Level: All Districts |
| Figure 3.121 |
Restricting Access to Online Resources: All Districts |
| Figure 3.122 |
Restricting Access to Online Resources by District Size |
| Figure 3.123 |
Restricting Access to Online Resources by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.124 |
Implementation of Online Collaboration for Instruction (Percentage Citing Initiative as High Priority) |
| Figure 3.125 |
Plans for Offering Online Courses by Grade Level: All Districts |
| Figure 3.126 |
Plans for Offering Online Courses by Grade Level and District Size |
| Figure 3.127 |
Plans for Offering Online Courses by Grade Level and Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.128 |
Online Course Categories: 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 3.129 |
Online Course Offerings by Subject Area in Middle and High Schools: All Districts |
| Figure 3.130 |
Penetration Rates of Online Content Providers: 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 3.131 |
Penetration Rates of Online Content Providers by District Size |
| Figure 3.132 |
Penetration Rates of Online Content Providers by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 3.133 |
Penetration Rates of Online Content Providers by Region |
| Figure 4.1 |
Professional Development Goals: All Districts |
| Figure 4.2 |
Frequency of Use of Types of Professional Development, 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 4.3 |
Types of Professional Development Used Frequently by District Size |
| Figure 4.4 |
Types of Professional Development Used Frequently by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 4.5 |
Effectiveness of Types of Professional Development: All Districts |
| Figure 4.6 |
Most Effective Types of Professional Development by District Size |
| Figure 4.7 |
Most Effective Types of Professional Development by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 4.8 |
Per-Pupil Professional Development Budget by District Size |
| Figure 4.9 |
Per-Pupil Professional Development Budget by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 4.10 |
Per-Pupil Professional Development Budget by Region |
| Figure 4.11 |
Outside Providers of Professional Development by District Size (as a Percentage of Total PD Budget) |
| Figure 4.12 |
Outside Providers of Professional Development by Metropolitan Status (as a Percentage of Total PD Budget) |
| Figure 4.13 |
Outside Providers of Professional Development by Region (as a Percentage of Total PD Budget) |
| Figure 4.14 |
Penetration Rates of Test-Prep Providers: 2011 and 2010 |
| Figure 4.15 |
Penetration Rates of Test-Prep Providers by District Size |
| Figure 4.16 |
Penetration Rates of Test-Prep Providers by Metropolitan Status |
| Figure 4.17 |
Penetration Rates of Test-Prep Providers by Region |
| Figure 4.18 |
Charter Schools by Management Organization, 2010-2011 |